feat: StudyAchievement가 BaseEntity 확장하도록 수정 #813
Conversation
Walkthrough
Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Job Summary for GradleCheck Style and Test to Develop :: build-test
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/main/java/com/gdschongik/gdsc/domain/study/domain/StudyAchievement.java (3)
Line range hint 37-43: AchievementType에 대한 문서화가 필요합니다.
achievementType 필드의 가능한 값들과 각각의 의미를 문서화하면 코드의 가독성과 유지보수성이 향상될 것 같습니다.
다음과 같이 문서화를 추가하는 것을 제안드립니다:
@Enumerated(EnumType.STRING)
+ /**
+ * 학습 성취 유형을 나타냅니다.
+ * 예시:
+ * - COMPLETION: 학습 완료
+ * - PARTICIPATION: 참여
+ * 등의 값을 가질 수 있습니다.
+ */
private AchievementType achievementType;Line range hint 22-24: 성능 최적화를 위한 인덱스 추가 검토가 필요합니다.
유니크 제약 조건이 걸린 컬럼들에 대해 인덱스 추가를 고려해보시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 특히 member_id와 study_id로 조회하는 쿼리가 자주 발생할 것으로 예상됩니다.
다음과 같은 인덱스 추가를 제안드립니다:
@Table(
uniqueConstraints = {
@UniqueConstraint(columnNames = {"member_id", "study_id", "achievement_type"})
},
+ indexes = {
+ @Index(name = "idx_study_achievement_member", columnList = "member_id"),
+ @Index(name = "idx_study_achievement_study", columnList = "study_id")
+ }
)파라미터 유효성 검증이 필요합니다.
StudyAchievement 엔티티의 create 메서드에 파라미터 유효성 검증이 필요합니다. 다른 도메인 엔티티들의 패턴을 보면 대부분 필수 파라미터에 대한 null 체크를 수행하고 있습니다.
public static StudyAchievement create(Member student, Study study, AchievementType achievementType) {
+ if (student == null || study == null || achievementType == null) {
+ throw new CustomException(STUDY_ACHIEVEMENT_PARAMETER_NULL);
+ }
return StudyAchievement.builder()
.student(student)
.study(study)
.achievementType(achievementType)
.build();
}🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint 45-57: 파라미터 유효성 검증이 필요합니다.
create 메서드에서 null 체크 등의 기본적인 유효성 검증을 추가하면 좋을 것 같습니다.
다음과 같은 검증 로직 추가를 제안드립니다:
public static StudyAchievement create(Member student, Study study, AchievementType achievementType) {
+ if (student == null || study == null || achievementType == null) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("필수 파라미터가 누락되었습니다.");
+ }
return StudyAchievement.builder()
.student(student)
.study(study)
.achievementType(achievementType)
.build();
}아래 스크립트로 다른 엔티티들의 유효성 검증 패턴을 확인해보겠습니다:
Let's analyze the validation patterns and builder usage across the codebase to make a more informed suggestion.
Let's analyze the validation patterns in the codebase to determine if parameter validation is needed.
Let's analyze validation patterns across the domain to make a more informed decision about whether parameter validation is needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: 다른 엔티티들의 유효성 검증 패턴 확인
rg -t java "throw new IllegalArgumentException" "src/main/java/com/gdschongik/gdsc/domain"
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any validation patterns in entity creation methods
ast-grep --pattern 'public static $_ create($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Also check for builder pattern usage
ast-grep --pattern '$$$
return $_.builder()
.$$$
.build();'
Length of output: 13017
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any null checks or validation in the codebase
rg -t java "if.*==\s*null\b.*throw" -A 2
Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any custom validation exceptions
fd -e java -x grep -l "Exception" {} \; | xargs cat
Length of output: 412056
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for validation patterns in create methods
ast-grep --pattern 'public static $_ create($$$) {
if ($$$) {
throw new $Exception($$$);
}
$$$
}'
# Also check for any validation in StudyAchievement class
ast-grep --pattern 'class StudyAchievement {
$$$
private StudyAchievement($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 217
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any null checks in similar create methods
rg "if.*null.*throw" -A 2 "src/main/java/com/gdschongik/gdsc/domain"
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for validation in similar entity creation methods
rg "private.*constructor.*\{" -A 5 "src/main/java/com/gdschongik/gdsc/domain/study/domain/StudyAchievement.java"
# Check for any validation in create methods
rg "public static.*create.*\{" -A 5 "src/main/java/com/gdschongik/gdsc/domain/study/domain/StudyAchievement.java"
# Look for any validation methods
rg "validate.*\{" -A 5 "src/main/java/com/gdschongik/gdsc/domain/study/domain/StudyAchievement.java"
Length of output: 615
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar entity creation patterns in the domain
rg "private.*constructor.*\{|public static.*create.*\{" -A 5 "src/main/java/com/gdschongik/gdsc/domain"
# Look for null validation patterns in other domain entities
rg "if.*==\s*null.*throw" -A 2 "src/main/java/com/gdschongik/gdsc/domain"
# Check for any validator classes
fd -e java -x grep -l "Validator" {} \; | xargs cat
Length of output: 184809
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/main/java/com/gdschongik/gdsc/domain/study/domain/StudyAchievement.java (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/com/gdschongik/gdsc/domain/study/domain/StudyAchievement.java (1)
3-3: BaseEntity 상속 구현이 적절합니다.
BaseEntity를 상속받음으로써 공통 필드(생성일시, 수정일시 등)를 활용할 수 있게 되었습니다.
Also applies to: 26-26
Sangwook02
deleted the
feature/794-study-achievement-extends-base-entity
branch
🌱 관련 이슈
📌 작업 내용 및 특이사항
📝 참고사항
📚 기타
Summary by CodeRabbit
StudyAchievement클래스가BaseEntity클래스를 상속하도록 수정되어, 공통 속성과 메서드를 활용할 수 있게 되었습니다.