-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dev: Document astyle python script #6292
Open
Ryanf55
wants to merge
1
commit into
ArduPilot:master
Choose a base branch
from
Ryanf55:document-asytle-script
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+8
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure we want to push users to run this all the time when only a few files are affected,,,,maybe we should specify that it should be checked if you have modified the following ..... libraries or files?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
More maintenance burden, @Hwurzburg ?
We should probably put this advice - run astyle - into the CI error message when one of these files fails the checks, if we haven't already. It's much more likely to be useful there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think the existing recommendation is useful because it
Proposing a reformat of the codebase was rejected in dev call because it would make existing PR's and backports much more difficult to rebase. Thus, I would propose recommending making new files astyle clean, and then we document that in the wiki.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what
you mean ? if you think that is an issue we could clarify what refers to
its true when run on the file you have modified it would correct existing format issues....maybe we could start allowing an unsquashed ending commit in PRs for style changes to allow any new touched file to be astyle corrected?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The devs have been very clear they do not want noise on PR's for style changes. What I am trying to say (not effectively I guess) is that the existing wiki instructions have no relation to our current development practices. From what I can tell, no one manually runs astyle on existing code using the method in the wiki.
I've proposed many options to improve the development practices and reduce the time developers spend nitpicking formatting. Hardly any of my proposals have been accepted by the development team, except for the python script which works wonderfully so far and the CI task for enforcing it.
Hence, I want to document it, because it's working well, and I truly hope other developers writing new libraries get on board with automatic formatting.