You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Possibly inaccurate statement on metaprogramming found here on ziglang.org under "Simplicity"
Zig has no macros and no metaprogramming, yet is still powerful enough to express complex programs in a clear, non-repetitive way.
Would "no metaprogramming" not be an incorrect statement about zig? Given that there is literally a subsection of the standard library called std.meta described as "Metaprogramming helpers."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Possibly inaccurate statement on metaprogramming found here on ziglang.org under "Simplicity"
Would "no metaprogramming" not be an incorrect statement about zig? Given that there is literally a subsection of the standard library called
std.meta
described as "Metaprogramming helpers."The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: