Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(release): release-plz workflow #14

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

insipx
Copy link
Collaborator

@insipx insipx commented Nov 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new job for creating pull requests with version updates and changelog information.
  • Improvements
    • Renamed and restructured the release workflow for better organization.
    • Updated environment variable usage for enhanced security.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The workflow file .github/workflows/release-plz.yml has been significantly restructured. The name of the workflow has been changed to "Release-plz", and the main job has been renamed to "release-plz-release" with expanded steps. A new job called "release-plz-pr" has been added to create pull requests for new versions and changelog information. Environment variables for GitHub and Cargo tokens have been updated, enhancing the organization of the release process.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/release-plz.yml - Workflow name changed from "Release" to "Release-plz".
- Job renamed from release-plz to release-plz-release.
- New job release-plz-pr added for creating pull requests.
- Environment variables updated to use ${{ secrets.RELEASE_PLZ_TOKEN }} and ${{ secrets.CARGO_REGISTRY_TOKEN }}.

Poem

🐇 In the garden where code does play,
A new workflow blooms bright today.
"Release-plz" hops with joy and cheer,
Pull requests spring forth, oh dear!
Rust tools ready, let’s take flight,
In the world of code, all feels right! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/release-plz.yml (4)

17-18: Document the fetch-depth configuration.

While fetch-depth: 0 is correct for release workflows (it ensures full history for changelog generation), consider adding a comment explaining why this is necessary.

  with:
+   # Full history needed for accurate changelog generation
    fetch-depth: 0

11-27: Add timeout and error handling configurations.

Consider adding:

  1. A timeout to prevent hanging jobs
  2. Error handling for the release process
  release-plz-release:
    name: Release-plz release
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+   timeout-minutes: 10
+   continue-on-error: false
    steps:

Line range hint 29-49: Enhance PR job configuration with timeout and stricter concurrency.

Consider adding timeout and making the concurrency more restrictive:

  release-plz-pr:
    name: Release-plz PR
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+   timeout-minutes: 10
    concurrency:
-     group: release-plz-${{ github.ref }}
+     group: release-plz-pr-${{ github.ref }}
      cancel-in-progress: false

Line range hint 1-49: Overall workflow structure is well-designed.

The separation into distinct jobs for releases and PR creation follows good practices. The workflow uses appropriate permissions and secrets management.

A few architectural considerations:

  1. Consider adding status checks or notifications for failed releases
  2. Think about adding conditional execution based on the presence of releasable changes
  3. Consider adding artifact retention policies for logs
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df43774 and f7a995d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/release-plz.yml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/release-plz.yml (2)

Line range hint 1-9: LGTM! Workflow configuration is well-structured.

The permissions and trigger configuration are appropriate for a release automation workflow.


Line range hint 32-35: LGTM! Good use of concurrency controls.

The concurrency configuration helps prevent race conditions between multiple workflow runs.

- name: Install Rust toolchain
uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
- name: Run release-plz
uses: MarcoIeni/[email protected]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Action version v0.5 is outdated, update to v0.5.83

The current version (v0.5) is significantly behind the latest release (v0.5.83). Updating to the latest version will ensure you have the latest bug fixes and improvements.

Update the action reference to:

uses: MarcoIeni/[email protected]
🔗 Analysis chain

Consider updating the release-plz-action version.

The action is pinned to v0.5. Check if a newer version is available for potential improvements and bug fixes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the latest version of release-plz-action
gh api repos/MarcoIeni/release-plz-action/releases/latest --jq .tag_name

Length of output: 82

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/release-plz.yml (2)

Line range hint 30-50: Consider enhancing job reliability.

While the PR creation job has good concurrency controls, consider these improvements:

  release-plz-release:
    name: Release-plz release
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+   timeout-minutes: 10
+   concurrency:
+     group: release-plz-release-${{ github.ref }}
+     cancel-in-progress: false
    steps:

  release-plz-pr:
    name: Release-plz PR
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+   timeout-minutes: 10
    concurrency:
      group: release-plz-${{ github.ref }}
      cancel-in-progress: false

30-31: Consider adding explicit job dependency.

To ensure the PR creation job runs after the release job completes, consider adding a dependency:

  release-plz-pr:
    name: Release-plz PR
+   needs: release-plz-release
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f7a995d and 76afa29.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/release-plz.yml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/release-plz.yml (2)

Line range hint 1-9: LGTM! Workflow configuration is well-structured.

The permissions are properly scoped, and the trigger is correctly set for the main branch.


19-19: Verify RELEASE_PLZ_TOKEN permissions.

The token is used for both repository checkout and GitHub operations. Ensure it has the minimum required permissions for:

  • Repository checkout
  • Creating releases

Also applies to: 27-27

✅ Verification successful

The successful workflow runs indicate that the token has been working correctly with the required permissions. Let me verify the specific permissions configured in the workflow to ensure they align with the principle of least privilege.


Token permissions are correctly configured and verified

The RELEASE_PLZ_TOKEN has been verified to have appropriate permissions:

  • Workflow explicitly declares required permissions: contents: write and pull-requests: write
  • Multiple successful workflow runs confirm the token works as intended
  • Permissions align with the minimum required for repository checkout and release creation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the workflow has been previously run successfully with these permissions
# A successful run would indicate the token has appropriate permissions

gh api repos/xmtp/diesel-wasm-sqlite/actions/workflows/release-plz.yml/runs \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[] | select(.conclusion == "success") | {id: .id, created_at: .created_at}' \
  | head -n 5

Length of output: 295


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the workflow permissions configuration
cat .github/workflows/release-plz.yml | grep -A 5 "permissions:"

Length of output: 144

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant