-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More info about -t
argument
#690
Comments
See #668 |
Sorry about not searching the issues history, I do better next time. I have two more question, be for I close the issue and they are, what should I expect the output of My last question is there any degradation in quality if I re-encode a flac file to a newer version. I have a test flac file that was written with libflac 1.1.0 and and a re-encoded version with libflac 1.4.3 and they both have the same MD5 sum so my guess is that there should be any degradation. |
I didn't meant to imply you should search the issue history, it is just that I recently answered the question, so referring to that answer is easier. You can see an example output at #487. You can also see for yourself by simply trying to test a file that is not a FLAC file. |
Oh, I missed the edit. Here is an example of what happens when only the MD5 does not match:
Considering re-encoding, I know of no reason it could 'degrade' a file. However, when re-encoding, I recommend having a backup in case something unexpected happens like power failure or disk drive corruption. |
I know you didn't meant it that way but I felt like I have failed my self more than anything else.
I have a UPS and do plan to set up backups. Thanks you for the help. |
Can you add more info of what
-t
does for flac cli tool. I very unsure what it does, my only guess is that it uses the MD5 value to recheck its self.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: