Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
According to https://gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en-us/articles/360050814292-CalculateContamination, it "calculates the fraction of reads coming from cross-sample contamination, given results from GetPileupSummaries". So, the equation makes sense. It looks like the OSCC sample was highly contaminated. (~12%) Any other highly contaminated samples? How about call-sSNV results? They might have shown hypermutation then. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
@tyamaguchi-ucla
I am reading my OSCC QC's contamination data, and here is one of the sample outputs:
But my other ATC call-gSNP sample is like:
Based on GATK's code, I think the contamination is based on the ratio of the contamination:
contaminationEstimate = contaminationOppositeDepth / totalDepthWeightedByOppositeFrequency
So 0.1 = 10%.
But for the error bar of the contamination level, the output doesn't have the estimate.high and estimate.low. Can I directly use the
+error / -error
as the error bar?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions