You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When building the validators, I initially used UUIDs in IndalekoRelationshipContains and IndalekoRelationshipContainedBy. However, it turned out that they should be used oppositely to function correctly. For instance, if X and Y represents the UUIDs for Contains and ContainedBy, respectively, we should use Y and X for Contains and ContainedBy.
So, either of these statements should be correct:
Object2 [Contains/ContainedBy] Object1 when we are building IndalekoRelation objects
The UUIDs are used oppositely.
Based on my observations of other ingesters, the first option is more likely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When building the validators, I initially used UUIDs in
IndalekoRelationshipContains
andIndalekoRelationshipContainedBy
. However, it turned out that they should be used oppositely to function correctly. For instance, if X and Y represents the UUIDs forContains
andContainedBy
, respectively, we should use Y and X forContains
andContainedBy
.So, either of these statements should be correct:
Object2
[Contains/ContainedBy]Object1
when we are building IndalekoRelation objectsBased on my observations of other ingesters, the first option is more likely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: