Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 17, 2025. It is now read-only.

Commit 46cd2db

Browse files
Review TZIP topic (#540)
1 parent 610356d commit 46cd2db

File tree

1 file changed

+21
-14
lines changed

1 file changed

+21
-14
lines changed

Diff for: docs/architecture/governance/improvement-process.md

+21-14
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,26 +1,29 @@
11
---
22
title: Tezos Improvement Process (TZIP)
33
last_update:
4-
date: 10 July 2023
4+
date: 31 January 2025
55
---
6-
As Tezos is a large decentralized project that is constantly evolving, its members need to have a mechanism for proposing improvements to the ecosystem.
6+
7+
Because Tezos is a large decentralized project that is constantly evolving, its members need to have a mechanism for proposing improvements to the ecosystem.
78

89
A Tezos Improvement Proposal (or TZIP, pronounced "tee-zip") is a document that offers ways to improve Tezos via new features, tools, or standards (e.g. smart contract interface specifications).
910

1011
Specifically, a TZIP is a design document proposed to the Tezos community, describing a feature for Tezos or for the related processes, tools, or artifacts (such as smart contracts).
1112

1213
Typically, TZIPs do not impact the Tezos protocol at all. They rather concern other parts of the Tezos ecosystem.
13-
Therefore, TZIPs address a different and complementary need when compared to the formal online governance process for protocol amendments.
14+
Therefore, TZIPs address a different and complementary need when compared to the formal online [governance process](/architecture/governance) for protocol amendments.
1415

1516
Any TZIP document should contain a concise technical specification and rationale that clearly articulates what the proposal is, how it may be implemented, and why the proposal is an improvement. It should also include an FAQ that documents, compares, and answers alternative options, opinions, and objections.
1617

17-
An explorer for all of the TZIPs, both past, prensent, and pending, can be found [here](https://tzip.tezosagora.org/).
18+
An explorer for all of the TZIPs, both past, present, and pending, can be found [here](https://tzip.tezosagora.org/).
1819

1920
## Key TZIP Standards
2021

2122
### [**TZIP-7**](https://tzip.tezosagora.org/proposal/tzip-7/): Fungible Asset (FA1.2)
2223

23-
TZIP-7, more commonly referred to as FA1.2, introduced an [ERC20](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20)-like fungible token standard for Tezos. At its core, FA1.2 contains a ledger that maps identities to token balances, provides a standard API for token transfer operations, as well as providing approval to external contracts (e.g. an auction) or accounts to transfer a user's tokens.
24+
TZIP-7, more commonly referred to as FA1.2, introduced an [ERC20](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20)-like fungible token standard for Tezos.
25+
Contracts that follow this standard have a ledger that maps identities to token balances, a standard API for token transfer operations, and a standard way to allow accounts or other contracts (such as an auction or marketplace) to transfer a user's tokens.
26+
For more information about the FA1.2 standard, see [FA1.2 tokens](/architecture/tokens/FA1.2).
2427

2528
For those familiar with [ERC20](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20), the FA1.2 interface differs from ERC-20 in that it does not contain `transferfrom`, which has instead been merged into a single transfer entrypoint.
2629
The FA1.2 specification is described in detail in [TZIP-7](https://gitlab.com/tzip/tzip/blob/master/proposals/tzip-7/tzip-7.md).
@@ -34,7 +37,7 @@ For implementations, see these templates:
3437

3538
To enable the adoption of dApps in the Tezos ecosystem, a standard for the communication between these applications and wallets is needed. Tezos app developers shouldn't need to implement yet another wallet for each dApp, and users shouldn't need a multitude of wallets to interact with various services.
3639

37-
TZIP-10 is a Tezos Improvement Proposal that specifies a standard way for dApps to interact with wallets. This standard thus enables Tezos users to use their wallet of choice with any Tezos dApp. By using the TZIP-10 wallet standard, app developers maximize the reach of their product to all users of TZIP-10 wallets.
40+
TZIP-10 specifies a standard way for dApps to interact with wallets. This standard thus enables Tezos users to use their wallet of choice with any Tezos dApp. By using the TZIP-10 wallet standard, app developers maximize the reach of their product to all users of TZIP-10 wallets.
3841

3942
### [**TZIP-12**](https://tzip.tezosagora.org/proposal/tzip-12/): Multi-Asset / NFT (FA2)
4043

@@ -44,11 +47,13 @@ TZIP-12, more commonly referred to as FA2, is a standard that provides improved
4447

4548
A particular FA2-compatible contract implementation may support either a single token type or multiple tokens, including hybrid implementations where multiple token kinds (fungible, non-fungible, non-transferable, etc) can coexist (e.g. in a fractionalized NFT contract).
4649

50+
For more information about FA2 tokens, see [FA2 tokens](/architecture/tokens/FA2) or the tutorials [Create a fungible token with the SmartPy FA2 library](/tutorials/smartpy-fa2-fungible) and [Create NFTs from a web application](/tutorials/create-nfts).
51+
4752
### [**TZIP-16**](https://tzip.tezosagora.org/proposal/tzip-16/): Contract Metadata
4853

4954
Contract metadata provides information that is not directly used for a contract's operation, whether about the contract's code (e.g. its interface, versioning) or the off-chain meaning of the contract's data (e.g. an artwork corresponding to an NFT). Tezos smart contracts need a standard way to access such important data, facilitating access to useful information that is needed for a scalable integration of wallets, explorers, and applications.
5055

51-
TZIP-16 proposes to address this need and ease the integration, discoverability, and querying of Tezos smart contracts. TZIP-16 is a standard for encoding access to smart contract metadata in JSON format stored either on-chain using *tezos-storage* or off-chain using IPFS or HTTP(S).
56+
TZIP-16 addresses this need and ease the integration, discoverability, and querying of Tezos smart contracts. TZIP-16 is a standard for encoding access to smart contract metadata in JSON format stored either on-chain using *tezos-storage* or off-chain using IPFS or HTTP(S).
5257

5358
TZIP-16 defines:
5459

@@ -57,13 +62,15 @@ TZIP-16 defines:
5762
* An extensible JSON format (JSON-Schema) to describe the metadata
5863
* Optional entrypoints to validate metadata information
5964

65+
The tutorial [Create a fungible token with the SmartPy FA2 library](/tutorials/smartpy-fa2-fungible) includes creating TZIP-16 metadata.
66+
6067
### [**TZIP-17**](https://tzip.tezosagora.org/proposal/tzip-17/): Permit & Meta-transactions
6168

6269
Transacting on the Tezos network requires users to pay gas in Tezos’ native token, tez. But what about those users who don’t have tez and want to complete a transaction on Tezos? Or users who want to avoid paying for individual contract calls (e.g. voting in a DAO) that could be batched?
6370

6471
TZIP-17 enables account abstraction: emulating multiple account types using standardized contract calls. This is done through pre-signing: a method to sign and submit Tezos transactions separately.
6572

66-
For instance, a “relayer” can submit a user’s pre-signed (meta) transaction and pay the tez fees on their behalf; a process called gas abstraction. This is especially convenient for subsidizing user onboarding, collecting multiple signatures when voting in a DAO, signing in a multisig, or batching transactions.
73+
For instance, a “relayer” can submit a user’s pre-signed (meta) transaction and pay the tez fees on their behalf, a process called gas abstraction. This is especially convenient for subsidizing user onboarding, collecting multiple signatures when voting in a DAO, signing in a multisig, or batching transactions.
6774

6875
TZIP-17 enables developers to provide more native experiences for user onboarding and allows users to pay fees using the token (e.g. a stablecoin) used in the transaction. The relayer still pays transaction fees in tez at the protocol level and, because Tezos is Proof-of-Stake, these [transaction fees accrue to stakeholders](http://ex.rs/protocol-level-fees/) rather than just a small group of miners.
6976

@@ -82,18 +89,18 @@ This metadata standard aims to:
8289
5. Be extensible
8390
6. Provide interoperability among ecosystem members (contracts, indexers, wallets, libraries, etc)
8491

85-
This standard also aims to be rich enough to describe a wide variety of asset and token types, from fungible tokens to semi-fungible tokens to nonfungibles.
92+
This standard also aims to be rich enough to describe a wide variety of asset and token types, from fungible tokens to semi-fungible tokens to NFTs.
8693

8794
### [**TZIP-22**](https://gitlab.com/tezos/tzip/-/blob/master/proposals/tzip-22/tzip-22.md): Vanity Name Resolution Standard
8895

89-
TZIP-22 is an extension of TZIP-016 describing a generic smart contract interface for resolving names to Tezos addresses and vice versa.
96+
TZIP-22 is an extension of TZIP-16 describing a generic smart contract interface for resolving names to Tezos addresses and vice versa.
9097

91-
Previous to this standard, indexers and wallets used ad-hoc methods for associating addresses with human-readable names, including:
98+
Before this standard, indexers and wallets used ad-hoc methods for associating addresses with human-readable names, including:
9299

93-
* using pre-configured (in some cases hardcoded) lists of names and addresses;
94-
* making use of TZIP-16 metadata.
100+
* Using pre-configured (in some cases hardcoded) lists of names and addresses
101+
* Making use of TZIP-16 metadata
95102

96-
Such methods present some problems:
103+
These methods have some problems:
97104

98105
* Pre-configured lists are hard to maintain and prone to breaking.
99106
* TZIP-16 metadata are published as part of a contract they relate to, which means the names are not globally unique nor authoritative.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)