You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For Fewest Moves mo3, after 2 attempts, the results are a little misleading. Yesterday at Cambridge Challenge, the competitor in first place after 2 attempts had a DNF on the second attempt, so he wasn't "really" winning. This means competitors will often do the math themselves of adding up the first two results. It would be nice if WCA live did this for you, and used that as the ranking.
I propose sorting competitors by mo2 after they have two times entered. Competitors who are tied on average with "no average yet", who don't have anything entered in their third solve, should have their tie broken first by the mean of their first two, then by best.
This won't affect what's output to the WCA site, because competitors need to have all 3 solves entered.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For Fewest Moves mo3, after 2 attempts, the results are a little misleading. Yesterday at Cambridge Challenge, the competitor in first place after 2 attempts had a DNF on the second attempt, so he wasn't "really" winning. This means competitors will often do the math themselves of adding up the first two results. It would be nice if WCA live did this for you, and used that as the ranking.
I propose sorting competitors by mo2 after they have two times entered. Competitors who are tied on average with "no average yet", who don't have anything entered in their third solve, should have their tie broken first by the mean of their first two, then by best.
This won't affect what's output to the WCA site, because competitors need to have all 3 solves entered.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: