-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CalendarDateToISO: Constrain behaviour for regnal years? #2865
Comments
See also <tc39/proposal-temporal#2865> requesting for more information how this case should actually be handled.
Meeting 2024-05-30:
@gibson042 to make a PR. Because current behavior is unspecified, this will not be a normative change. |
I've just found tc39/ecma402#540 which actually wants a different behaviour for |
See also <tc39/proposal-temporal#2865> requesting for more information how this case should actually be handled.
See also <tc39/proposal-temporal#2865> requesting for more information how this case should actually be handled.
See also <tc39/proposal-temporal#2865> requesting for more information how this case should actually be handled.
@gibson042 Will you have time to work on this in the next while? If not, I can take it over. |
I think this should extend #2940, but don't plan to start it until after that lands (or is at least in a final form). |
It'd be nice to have some more detailed information how constraining should work for regnal years in the Japanese calendar.
Whereas the spec polyfill changes to the previous era (for both
constrain
andreject
overflow behaviour):Spec polyfill has (for both
constrain
andreject
overflow behaviour):Questions I've asked myself:
constrain
overflow constrain to the start/end of the era?reject
overflow reject dates before/after the era?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: