Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

changes to topo prediction for new executor #306

Open
1 of 2 tasks
bfalacerda opened this issue Apr 22, 2016 · 2 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

changes to topo prediction for new executor #306

bfalacerda opened this issue Apr 22, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@bfalacerda
Copy link
Contributor

bfalacerda commented Apr 22, 2016

  • only provide Fremen predictions when the edge has been traversed more than x ties
  • compare ignoring "ending in wrong node" nav fails when creating predictions vs counting them as successes (current version)
@marc-hanheide
Copy link
Member

Here's an idea for @gestom

Can't we use fremen to not only estmate the mean at any given time, but at the same time also try to estimate the variance, and the sample density (each sample is a Dirac, but we could "spread" them out as Gaussians, maybe, to estimate some smaple density) for each time when estimating travel time? This would allow to provide confidence intervals for the estimations (e.g. upper and lower bounds for p=0.05). The topo prediction could, e.g., only trust prediction with a certain confidence, or always be optimistic or pessimistic by choosing the upper or lower bound for its planning? Just an idea, but I could see this as a principled way to incorporate confidence (or almost guarantees) into the system. Not for this year's deployment, but as an idea for future work?

@Jailander
Copy link
Member

Second Check is possible using #319 first check would be better done by updating fremenserver to use the recency model I will ask @gestom to start planning for this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants