Add a "did you mean <>?" fix to UnknownRule

[a-frantz]

Upgrading discussion #106 to an issue, as I consider it good-to-go.

This will almost definitely include adding a new dependency to the workspace. There are some spellcheck-type crates out there and we should pull a solution off the shelf. If you're not sure which crate to pick, drop a comment and one of us will help you find the right choice!

[bhartiRaz]

Hello, could you please assign this issue to me?

[a-frantz]

Hello, could you please assign this issue to me?

@bhartiRaz
I saw your comment on #202 first, and have assigned that issue to you. You should work on getting a PR addressing 202 merged before claiming another issue.

[mrswastik-robot]

hii @a-frantz , I would love to work on this, I researched a bit and ig strsim-rs crate can be a solution in this case,,,would love to hear from you on how to proceed on from here...

[a-frantz]

@mrswastik-robot strsim seems like a suitable crate to me, from a brief scan! I also found symspell which might work as well if strsim turns out to not work for whatever reason.

First, I would recommend you read through our CONTRIBUTING guide if you haven't already.

When you're ready to get coding, please write a function in https://github.com/stjude-rust-labs/wdl/blob/main/wdl-lint/src/util.rs which takes an "unknown rule ID" and returns the nearest match from our set of rule IDs. Then modify https://github.com/stjude-rust-labs/wdl/blob/main/wdl-lint/src/rules/unknown_rule.rs to call that function and provide the nearest match in the fix message of the diagnostic.

[mrswastik-robot]

hii @a-frantz, I have linked a PR, you can review it whenever you get time, I would be more than happy to make requested code changes.