We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If I'm already on the page for Animancer.AnimationEventReceiver, it doesn't really need to use the full name when referring to members in that type.
Animancer.AnimationEventReceiver
The summary in that image could just be "Constructs a new AnimationEventReceiver and sets the Source and Callback."
AnimationEventReceiver
Source
Callback
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also, the current implementation fails to auto-link to those members.
If I write:
Animancer.AnimationEventReceiver.Source
AnimationEventReceiver.Source
Then only the middle one automatically becomes a link to that member.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
If I'm already on the page for
Animancer.AnimationEventReceiver
, it doesn't really need to use the full name when referring to members in that type.The summary in that image could just be "Constructs a new
AnimationEventReceiver
and sets theSource
andCallback
."The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: