You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
as i already mentioned "rm -Rf" doesn't work on windows systems. aditionally the "FSUtil.systemLines" uses "someprog > somefile" for capturing and parsing program output. this of course does also not work on windows systems and should be fixed. i think of writing a "shell-monad" similar to "hsh (haskell shell)" for similar tasks.
rm -Rf is indeed one of the couple of things that necessitate running smackage within the cygwin environment in Windows, and it would be better to create a SML-level facility for crawling the directories, deleting stuff and then deleting the directories.
I believe our testing was that pipe-to-file works in the Windows cmd shell - can we get a confirmation that pipe-to-file does not work using OS.Process.system in Windows XP/Vista/7? I was under the impression that it did.
If that doesn't work, I don't know of a good alternative, since "fork" only exists in Posix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
True enough, Windows usually has its own commands to do stuff, they're just different.
Since we already have a separate compilation path for Windows, I wouldn't be sad about having an "fsutil-windows.sml" that duplicated "fsutil.sml". Fundamentally, though, I'm going to think of cygwin support as good enough unless we get someone who is interested in poking around and testing things in Windows.
magenbluten writes in comments to #15
rm -Rf
is indeed one of the couple of things that necessitate running smackage within the cygwin environment in Windows, and it would be better to create a SML-level facility for crawling the directories, deleting stuff and then deleting the directories.I believe our testing was that pipe-to-file works in the Windows
cmd
shell - can we get a confirmation that pipe-to-file does not work usingOS.Process.system
in Windows XP/Vista/7? I was under the impression that it did.If that doesn't work, I don't know of a good alternative, since "fork" only exists in Posix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: