You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We want to add "sample_formula" as a metadata key to standard plans. To do this, we need a QLineEdit on each plan window.
We also want to include some placeholder text that provides a sample of how to consistently format a chemical formula. How precise should we get with this? Some common Li battery cathodes would be "LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2" and "LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2". LaTeX formatting? Something else? Too niche to care?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think I preferred the "LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2" rather than fractions or latex formatting.
Or maybe all of them are fine, instead, we can do a smarter query similar to Material Project? like 'Li-Mn-Ni-O', so this will show up the LNMO no matter which formats ppl use?
I think I preferred the "LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2" rather than fractions or latex formatting.
Well some materials need fractions, the one I included is a specific material for battery cathodes (NMC-111). I agree that the LaTeX formatting shouldn't be required, though.
For searching for an exact formula, you would need a way to handle elements being in arbitrary order (e.g. NiMnCoO2 vs MnCoNiO2). The trick will be turning the query string ("Eu2SiCl2O3") into one or more Tiled queries. Do you see a path toward doing that? I suspect materials project has several fields to keep track of chemical formulae. Or else some black magic involving regular expressions?
Per Haven developers meeting on 2025-01-14:
We want to add "sample_formula" as a metadata key to standard plans. To do this, we need a QLineEdit on each plan window.
We also want to include some placeholder text that provides a sample of how to consistently format a chemical formula. How precise should we get with this? Some common Li battery cathodes would be "LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2" and "LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2". LaTeX formatting? Something else? Too niche to care?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: