You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For non-dereferencable identifiers, the Client MUST present a client_id value that has been registered with the OP via either OIDC dynamic or static registration. See also [OIDC-DYNAMIC-CLIENT-REGISTRATION].
When requesting Dynamic Client Registration, the Client MUST specify the scope in the metadata and include webid in its value (space-separated list).
The spec doesn't say clearly if the OIDC Provider MUST, SHOULD, or MAY support Dynamic Registration.
I don't think OP MUST provide DynReg and we should clarify it with explicit SHOULD or MAY.
As far as I recall, Keycloack would need to enable CORS on the Client Registration Endpoint to work with Solid-OIDC. Leaving DynReg optional should result in more fully conformant OPs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
elf-pavlik
changed the title
Denamic Registration requirement level for OP
Dynamic Registration requirement level for OP
Mar 2, 2023
My take on dynamic client registration is that Solid-OIDC absolutely should not require it. Solid-OIDC should also not forbid it.
Between MAY and SHOULD, I think MAY is the better option. Dynamic client registration is useful in certain contexts, but generally, the use of client identifiers is much better.
This is one of the issues raised in a conversation with @dteleguin
5.2. OIDC Registration
The spec doesn't say clearly if the OIDC Provider MUST, SHOULD, or MAY support Dynamic Registration.
I don't think OP MUST provide DynReg and we should clarify it with explicit SHOULD or MAY.
As far as I recall, Keycloack would need to enable CORS on the Client Registration Endpoint to work with Solid-OIDC. Leaving DynReg optional should result in more fully conformant OPs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: