Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve error handling in check #222

Open
simonsan opened this issue May 5, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #224
Open

Improve error handling in check #222

simonsan opened this issue May 5, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #224
Labels
A-commands Area: Related to commands in `rustic_core` A-errors Area: error handling needs improvement C-enhancement Category: New feature or request

Comments

@simonsan
Copy link
Contributor

simonsan commented May 5, 2024

First, the most important thing is that prune (being the only command which removes pack or index files) doesn't leave the repository in an unsane condition. This is why check is called here. (to admit, check currently does not produce an error but only logs an error! - I'm about to improve this next).

Originally posted by @aawsome in #221 (comment)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the S-triage Status: Waiting for a maintainer to triage this issue/PR label May 5, 2024
@aawsome aawsome linked a pull request May 6, 2024 that will close this issue
@simonsan simonsan added A-errors Area: error handling needs improvement C-enhancement Category: New feature or request A-commands Area: Related to commands in `rustic_core` and removed S-triage Status: Waiting for a maintainer to triage this issue/PR labels Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-commands Area: Related to commands in `rustic_core` A-errors Area: error handling needs improvement C-enhancement Category: New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant