Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump version to 1.0.0-alpha.0 #36

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

tcharding
Copy link
Member

@tcharding tcharding commented Jan 29, 2025

In preparation for release bump the version number, add a changelog entry, and update the lock files.

This is the alpha release. Explicitly includes deprecated code that will be deleted in the 1.0 release.

This crate is the first of the so-called 'leaf crates' in rust-bitcoin. Defined as crates we control at the bottom of the dependency tree of the bitcoin crate. I know its supposed to be dependency graph but then there would be no 'bottom'. There must be a real term for this?

Close: #34

@tcharding tcharding force-pushed the 01-30-release-1.0-alpa branch from 62a830e to 62484ee Compare January 29, 2025 22:45
@tcharding tcharding changed the title Bump version to 1.0.0-alpha Bump version to 1.0.0-alpha Jan 29, 2025
In preparation for release bump the version number, add a changelog
entry, and update the lock files.

This is the alpha release. Explicitly includes deprecated code that will
be deleted in the `1.0` release.

This crate is the first of the so-called 'leaf crates' in
`rust-bitcoin`. Defined as crates we control at the bottom of the
dependency tree of the `bitcoin` crate. I know its supposed to be
dependency graph but then there would be no 'bottom'. There must be a
real term for this?
@tcharding tcharding force-pushed the 01-30-release-1.0-alpa branch from 62484ee to 7cd22d4 Compare January 29, 2025 22:47
@tcharding
Copy link
Member Author

tcharding commented Jan 29, 2025

cc @apoelstra if you merge this when you get to it I can cut the release. Can you just do it when you have time/energy to give it a few minutes thought so this can be a test run for units et al.

So I have the process clear:

  1. Release 1.0.0-alpha.0
  2. Test and iterate, releasing 1.0.0-alpha.x as needed
  3. When we are happy: remove all deprecated functions
  4. Release 1.0.0

The final 1.0.0-alpha.x should be exactly the same as 1.0.0 but with deprecated stuff. Have I got it? I'm slightly concerned that this process is not going to work when there is a stack i.e., primitives then units combined with what ever rust-bitcoin releases we are trying to do. I can't quite put my finger on it though.

@tcharding
Copy link
Member Author

tcharding commented Jan 29, 2025

Started rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#3980

@tcharding tcharding changed the title Bump version to 1.0.0-alpha Bump version to 1.0.0-alpha.0 Feb 3, 2025
@tcharding
Copy link
Member Author

I'm merging and releasing this - first alpha, LFG.

@tcharding tcharding merged commit 700148c into rust-bitcoin:master Feb 3, 2025
11 checks passed
@tcharding tcharding deleted the 01-30-release-1.0-alpa branch February 3, 2025 02:26
@tcharding
Copy link
Member Author

Tagged and published.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Release 1.0-alpha.0
1 participant