We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RoughAnnotationImpl.show()
Given that the AnnotationState is
AnnotationState
type AnnotationState = 'unattached' | 'not-showing' | 'showing';
and when we call the private attach() method, we first check if the state is 'unattached'
attach()
'unattached'
private attach() { if (this._state === 'unattached' && this._e.parentElement) { // ... } }
I think the this.attach() statement in the 'not-showing' case is redundant.
this.attach()
'not-showing'
show(): void { switch (this._state) { case 'unattached': // ... case 'showing': // ... case 'not-showing': this.attach(); if (this._svg) { this.render(this._svg, false); } break; } }
Not sure if I'm missing anything : )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You're probably right. It's redundant but benign as well. I'll have to think of why this was added. Wish I had commented the code :)
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Given that the
AnnotationState
isand when we call the private
attach()
method, we first check if the state is'unattached'
I think the
this.attach()
statement in the'not-showing'
case is redundant.Not sure if I'm missing anything : )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: