You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In most circuit diagrams, a "current source" or "current sink" as used in block diagrams of devices such as the implementation of the TLV431 or LM4041 (and many others, including current mirrors and other basic analog building blocks), actually are referring to a "current-limiting-diode" ideal active device which will increase or decrease it's resistance until a specified pre-programmed amount of current flows through the device.
The non-physical infinite-voltage characteristics of the "current source" node in the status quo means it's very very difficult to simulate or model simple block functional diagrams or designs that include such current-limiting active devices.
Although it's possible to ad-hoc construct such a diode using a jfet and a resistor in the simulator, it's painstaking and time-consuming and requires individually tweaking the jfet and resistor parameters, AND changes the impedance of the underlying circuit in a way that an ideal "current source" current limiter would not. Additionally, the jfet model itself seems to have some major convergence issues.
It's also difficult to construct such a device using the VCCS or CCCS builtins, because technically such a device is dependent on BOTH inputvoltage and current and outputs both voltage and current changes in a feedback.
What would be easiest and simplest is if the existing "current source" node could be given a checkbox which would enable enforce the min/max clamping behaviors of what the ideal current source node in other circuits is intending to represent. Nobody believes that when you put a "current source" /current clamper bjt or symbol in a block diagram that said current source is supposed to represent infinite energy.
I have looked into adding this myself as a patch but I don't really have the time to do it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The "current source" in the simulation will generate arbitrarily higher or lower voltages than is physically possible in the circuit and is therefore intrinsically non-physical.
In most circuit diagrams, a "current source" or "current sink" as used in block diagrams of devices such as the implementation of the TLV431 or LM4041 (and many others, including current mirrors and other basic analog building blocks), actually are referring to a "current-limiting-diode" ideal active device which will increase or decrease it's resistance until a specified pre-programmed amount of current flows through the device.
The non-physical infinite-voltage characteristics of the "current source" node in the status quo means it's very very difficult to simulate or model simple block functional diagrams or designs that include such current-limiting active devices.
Although it's possible to ad-hoc construct such a diode using a jfet and a resistor in the simulator, it's painstaking and time-consuming and requires individually tweaking the jfet and resistor parameters, AND changes the impedance of the underlying circuit in a way that an ideal "current source" current limiter would not. Additionally, the jfet model itself seems to have some major convergence issues.
It's also difficult to construct such a device using the VCCS or CCCS builtins, because technically such a device is dependent on BOTH inputvoltage and current and outputs both voltage and current changes in a feedback.
What would be easiest and simplest is if the existing "current source" node could be given a checkbox which would enable enforce the min/max clamping behaviors of what the ideal current source node in other circuits is intending to represent. Nobody believes that when you put a "current source" /current clamper bjt or symbol in a block diagram that said current source is supposed to represent infinite energy.
I have looked into adding this myself as a patch but I don't really have the time to do it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: