Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: more output options #11

Open
alexjago opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Feature Request: more output options #11

alexjago opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@alexjago
Copy link

alexjago commented Jul 5, 2023

Hi,

I'd be interested in using diagram but it's a little tricky right now.

My workflow is markdown to html (just pandoc and a makefile, not quarto), so diagram doesn't really work unless one or both of embed-resources and extract-media options are active.

But those aren't good options for me - there's plenty of other things that I link to in a given document, but nothing else that I'd want embedded or extracted.

Rather, what I'd like is to be able to configure diagram to output its images to some path and then link to that. (I got halfway there by setting the cache directory, but then tripped up on the hashes being different.)

If this is out of scope for the project because it's not a use case that makes sense for other output formats, fair enough.

@tarleb tarleb added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 27, 2024
@tarleb
Copy link
Member

tarleb commented Apr 27, 2024

Apologies for the late reply, my open source work had to lay dormant for a while.

Is this still something that you need, or did you find a workaround?

@alexjago
Copy link
Author

Hey, thanks for responding, all good!

I think I just didn't do anything with embedded diagrams.

My particular use case is probably going to change anyway (shifting from plain pandoc + makefile to something Jekyll based) so I definitely fall into one of "don't need" or "worked around".

I still think this is a use case that'd make sense to somebody, of course.

@tarleb
Copy link
Member

tarleb commented Apr 30, 2024

OK, thank you. I'll leave this open then, but won't treat it as a priority for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants