We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In my opinion, authors define L_{vlb} = L_0 + ... + L_T, not L_t.
Thus, they may calculate the vlb loss with scale factor T (self.num_timestep).
Originally posted by @yhy258 in #114 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
so, which means we use L_t * T (self. num_timestep) to approximate L_ {vlb}?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Thus, they may calculate the vlb loss with scale factor T (self.num_timestep).
Originally posted by @yhy258 in #114 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: