-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: Update container images to latest UBI baseimage #4227
Comments
The Exchange uses |
Use ubi-micro instead of ubi-minimal to reduce the threat surface attack area. Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mordyk <[email protected]>
Use ubi-micro instead of ubi-minimal to reduce the threat surface attack area. Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mordyk <[email protected]>
Use ubi-micro instead of ubi-minimal to reduce the threat surface attack area. Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mordyk <[email protected]>
Use ubi-micro instead of ubi-minimal to reduce the threat surface attack area. Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mordyk <[email protected]>
Use ubi-micro instead of ubi-minimal to reduce the threat surface attack area. Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mordyk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mordyk <[email protected]>
Issue #4227 - Update container images to latest UBI base image
I've never been a fan of using IMHO, this should be reverted to use the whatever is most current, |
Another consideration.... When you need to do a security scan, you'll get a bunch of CVEs against the anax container contents. This might be a CVE list since |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We should update all container images to UBI 9.5 to pull in security fixes and other updates.
Describe the solution you'd like.
Currently we are using UBI 9.2. There is a newer version, 9.5 available for all architectures (amd64, arm64, ppc64le, s390x). The Dockerfiles should change to FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.5
Additionally, some work should be done to see if we can support ubi-micro instead of ubi-minimal to reduce the threat surface attack area.
relates to #3852
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: