-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GHA build cache ERROR: failed to solve: Internal: not found #5784
Comments
Might be related to Github moving to V2 version of their API https://github.blog/changelog/2024-09-16-notice-of-upcoming-deprecations-and-changes-in-github-actions-services/ |
I did see some other mentions of upcoming cache changes. The fact that it generally does not happen on retry made me think it wasn't that. The brownout dates are certainly interesting, but it happened this morning which is not in the listed dates. |
We already have v2 implementation in BuildKit v0.20.0 . Afaics, most repositories are already using v2 when runners start, although at least initially only some repositories had support. The deadlines are for shutting down v1. |
If you have a link for your Github actions run then you can post it for more details. |
This is on a private repository unfortunately, can't link. |
@bhperry - We'd be very grateful if you would reach out to the GitHub support team, open a ticket and drop the link to your run in the private repository. We'd like to take a look to understand this behaviour. Feel free to mention this comment as well and ask the team to escalate to engineering. |
@Link- ticket submitted |
Contributing guidelines and issue reporting guide
Well-formed report checklist
Description of bug
Bug description
Lately I have started to see docker builds in Github Actions that use the GHA build cache fail regularly when exporting the cache at the end of a build. Re-running the build will often cause it to succeed, but we get the failures almost every day now.
Have been running with the GHA cache for a while now with no issues.
Reproduction
Happens with a variety of different image builds, some of which are very thin wrappers on existing images. So any basic Dockerfile should work.
We run the builds from within a github action, automated by python scripts. But the end result is to run commands like this:
Version information
ubuntu-20.04 github actions runner
Docker-Buildx 0.21.1
Docker Client 26.1.3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: