Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Function Request] Table 77 - Report Selections - GetEmailAttachmentForCust, GetEmailAttachmentForVend #19046

Open
rvanbekkum opened this issue Jul 4, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
extensibility-enhancement New feature or request related to extensibility SCM GitHub request for SCM area

Comments

@rvanbekkum
Copy link
Contributor

rvanbekkum commented Jul 4, 2022

Dear ALAppExtensions team,

Through this issue we would like to request table 77 Report Selections to be extended with the following procedures:

  • GetEmailAttachmentForCust
  • GetEmailAttachmentForVend

This to align the functions that are exposed (N.B. currently only for email body and printing, but not for email attachments).

Could you please add these with (1) a TempBlob: Codeunit "Temp Blob" parameter and (2) OnBefore/OnAfter events for both customer and vendor procedures?

Internal work item: AB#442261

@rvanbekkum
Copy link
Contributor Author

The following requests are all related to each other, to improve extensibility for mailing and reporting:
microsoft/BusinessCentralApps#1187, #19043, #19045, #19046

See also: #18152 and #18943

@AlexanderYakunin AlexanderYakunin added the extensibility-enhancement New feature or request related to extensibility label Jul 5, 2022
@pri-kise
Copy link
Contributor

pri-kise commented Feb 6, 2023

@rvanbekkum is this request sill up-todate?
If you are willing to provide an implementation and test for this extensibility gap, then maybe this issue could be transferred to the BaseApp Contribution Pilot and you could solve it faster than it can be done by microsoft?
(@JesperSchulz )

@rvanbekkum
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rvanbekkum is this request sill up-todate? If you are willing to provide an implementation and test for this extensibility gap, then maybe this issue could be transferred to the BaseApp Contribution Pilot and you could solve it faster than it can be done by microsoft? (@JesperSchulz )

Hi @pri-kise, thank you for your message. Yes, this request is still relevant and up-to-date. There are various extensibility gaps with regards to emailing via report selections, see the original comment and related issues. :)

@JesperSchulz
Copy link
Contributor

JesperSchulz commented Jun 18, 2024

Now tracked through internal work item AB#525622

@JesperSchulz JesperSchulz added the SCM GitHub request for SCM area label Jun 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
extensibility-enhancement New feature or request related to extensibility SCM GitHub request for SCM area
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants