Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configuration option to only manually open signal rooms/dms #469

Closed
jakobw123 opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Configuration option to only manually open signal rooms/dms #469

jakobw123 opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jakobw123
Copy link

I've been playing around with a Matrix Homeserver setup lately, via the Matrix Docker Ansible Deploy bundle. As this is my first project regarding the Matrix world, i'm fairly new to the topic.
I've also added some features such as this Signal Bridge as well as the WhatsApp Bridge.
I would like to be able to only manually sync rooms/dms between other ecosystems, like Signal, WhatsApp, and Matrix.
For WhatsApp i've been able to achieve this by turning off the backfill and making use of the open <room id> command. Room ids can be accessed with the list <contacts/groups> command.

I would like to configure my Signal Bridge in similar way. Unfortunately, i couldn't find any commands to manually sync/open rooms/dms from Signal to Matrix.

  • Have i missed any commands already available, which achieve manual room openings?
  • If not, are there any plans to add those type of features to newer versions of this Signal Bridge?
  • Or does anyone added such features to their own project and could give me a short hint on how to add those to my project?

In addition i would like to prevent the Signal Bridge from syncing rooms with Matrix when new messages are received in the signal-sided room (after linking my Signal account with the Signal Bridge Bot).

  • Are there any settings currently available to prevent auto sync on incoming message events?
@jakobw123 jakobw123 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 2, 2024
@tulir
Copy link
Member

tulir commented Aug 17, 2024

Duplicate of #254

@tulir tulir marked this as a duplicate of #254 Aug 17, 2024
@tulir tulir closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants