Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml #137

Open
bjorn opened this issue Feb 2, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml #137

bjorn opened this issue Feb 2, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@bjorn
Copy link
Member

bjorn commented Feb 2, 2022

According to its own documentation, quick-xml can be 50 times faster than xml-rs. Of course, xml-rs might be fast enough for most people, but I think it's worth looking into the required porting effort and doing some measurements.

@bjorn bjorn changed the title Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml Feb 2, 2022
@bjorn bjorn changed the title Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml Feb 2, 2022
@aleokdev aleokdev modified the milestones: 1.0.0, 0.11.0 Feb 7, 2022
@aleokdev aleokdev modified the milestones: 0.11.0, 0.10.1 Mar 5, 2022
@bjorn bjorn removed this from the 0.11.0 milestone Apr 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants