You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to its own documentation, quick-xml can be 50 times faster than xml-rs. Of course, xml-rs might be fast enough for most people, but I think it's worth looking into the required porting effort and doing some measurements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
bjorn
changed the title
Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml
Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xmlFeb 2, 2022
bjorn
changed the title
Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml
Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml
Feb 2, 2022
According to its own documentation,
quick-xml
can be 50 times faster thanxml-rs
. Of course,xml-rs
might be fast enough for most people, but I think it's worth looking into the required porting effort and doing some measurements.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: