You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Especially methods that create Type objects manually based on user input, we should probably check better against various constellations that don't make sense. For example: verify that no primitive type is provided where it's not possible (like in wildcards).
Or e.g. in ParameterizedType, the type args coming in should match the type variables on the raw type... Checking the bounds is yet another story.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ljacqu
changed the title
Check arguments better
Check method arguments better
Dec 30, 2022
Especially methods that create
Type
objects manually based on user input, we should probably check better against various constellations that don't make sense. For example: verify that no primitive type is provided where it's not possible (like in wildcards).Or e.g. in ParameterizedType, the type args coming in should match the type variables on the raw type... Checking the bounds is yet another story.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: