[Feature]: Add asymmetric matcher for comparing with snapshot

[MillerSvt]

🚀 Feature Proposal

Sometimes there is a need to check complex objects in checking calls to the function. This is often due to the definition of some large mock object that would satisfy the condition. But this makes the test code less readable.

I suggest adding an asymmetric matcher expect.matchSnapshot(name) to solve this problem.

For a detailed description of the desired API, see the Examples section.

Motivation

This proposal will simplify the code of tests by making checks in snapshots.

Example

expect(func).toHaveBeedCalledWith('foo', 123, expect.matchSnapshot());
// equivalent to
expect(func).toHaveBeedCalledWith('foo', 123, expect.anything());
expect(func.mock.calls[0][2]).toMatchSnapshot();

// ---

expect(func).toHaveBeedCalledWith('foo', 123, expect.matchSnapshot('some name'));
// equivalent to
expect(func).toHaveBeedCalledWith('foo', 123, expect.anything());
expect(func.mock.calls[0][2]).toMatchSnapshot('some name');

Pitch

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 30 days.