Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving Git Rev News and Data Readability: Color Scheme and Visual Card #635

Open
Muhammad-Awab opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@Muhammad-Awab
Copy link

Muhammad-Awab commented Mar 22, 2023

To improve the readability of Git Rev News and Data, we can begin by changing the color scheme and creating visually appealing cards. For the color scheme, I suggest using white as the primary color since it catches the eye effectively. We can also include attractive title topics and beautiful card designs.

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

Please reduce the title of this issue and put the details of what you want to do in the description.

For example please tell us what color scheme you would like to use, and what kind of visually appealing cards you would like to create.

@Muhammad-Awab Muhammad-Awab changed the title To enhance the readability of git rev news and data, let's start by changing the color scheme. Once that's done, we can create visually appealing cards to make it perfect. Improving Git Rev News and Data Readability: Color Scheme and Visual Card Mar 22, 2023
@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks! Could you give us an example of how the new color scheme would look like?

Also I am not sure what "beautiful card designs" means. Can you point to such thing on another website or show us an example of that?

@Muhammad-Awab
Copy link
Author

Yeah sure

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

I got a suggestion for the webpage to have a high-contrast (and/or dark mode) version even though it's not particularly bad (most guidelines pass) as some people find it hard to read.

Also it seems that the "reader mode" of Firefox (that's supposed to help) isn't available, while it works on other sites.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants