DOC: fix wrong (analytic) geometric factors

Author: halbmy

doc/examples/3_ert/plot_02_ert_field_data.py

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 ###############################################################################
 # The data file does not contain geometric factors (token field 'k'),
 # so we create them based on the given topography.
-k0 = ert.geometricFactors(data)  # the analytical one
+k0 = ert.createGeometricFactors(data)  # the analytical one
 data['k'] = ert.createGeometricFactors(data, numerical=True)
 
 ###############################################################################
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
 _ = ert.showData(data, vals=k0/ data['k'], label='Topography effect',
                  cMin=2/3, cMax=3/2, logScale=True, cMap="bwr")
 
+
+sdfsfsf
+
 ###############################################################################
 # We can now compute the apparent resistivity and display it, once with the
 # wrong analytical formula and once with the numerical values in data['k']