[BUG] Limited permission overlay does not show up when paired with maxAssets: maxAssetsCount: 1 and specialPickerType: SpecialPickerType.noPreview

[Dimilkalathiya]

Describe the bug
Limited permission overlay does not show up when paired with maxAssets: maxAssetsCount: 1 and specialPickerType: SpecialPickerType.noPreview

How to reproduce
Execute below mentioned code:

AssetPicker.pickAssets(
          context,
          pickerConfig: AssetPickerConfig(
            maxAssets: 1,
            requestType: RequestType.image,
            specialPickerType: SpecialPickerType.noPreview,
          ),
        );

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Execute above mentioned code on IOS device
2. Provide limited permission and select few assets and continue
3. Limited access overlay is not visible

Expected behavior

• Limited access overlay should be visible depending on permission and should not be influenced by above mentioned parameters

Screenshots

1. with maxAssets: maxAssetsCount: 1 and specialPickerType: SpecialPickerType.noPreview:

2. if either of value is changed (eg: changing maxAssets: maxAssetsCount: 2 OR removing optional property specialPickerType: SpecialPickerType.noPreview):

Version information

• Device: iPhone 15 pro (simulator)
• OS: iOS 17.5
• Package Version: 9.2.1
• Flutter Version: 3.24.0

Additional context

Culprit:

For android:

flutter_wechat_assets_picker/lib/src/delegates/asset_picker_builder_delegate.dart

Lines 1089 to 1090 in f15336e

	if (isPreviewEnabled || !isSingleAssetMode)
	bottomActionBar(context),

For IOS:

flutter_wechat_assets_picker/lib/src/delegates/asset_picker_builder_delegate.dart

Lines 1116 to 1117 in f15336e

	if (isPreviewEnabled || !isSingleAssetMode)
	Positioned.fill(top: null, child: bottomActionBar(context)),

Solution:
Updating condition would probably fix issue:

if (isPreviewEnabled || !isSingleAssetMode || permissionNotifier.value == PermissionState.limited)

Questions:

1. Is above mentioned code there for specific reason or to avoid any issue?
2. If this is not expected behaviour please ping me i can generate PR :)

[AlexV525]

Hi @Dimilkalathiya. Thank you for your report and the PR. I've setup another change request to cover more details and cases, could you review it? #627