-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gracefully stopping agents & Timeouts #16
Comments
|
Regarding the first issue is this functionality available outside of the mapper? That would be ideal. How does the nanite-admin get a hold of it? Just curious how do you deal with creating new agents to scale? Time-outs impacts that decision for us big time. |
That functionality is only available in the mapper. If you need to react on it with some other means I'd say the best way is to fire off a new request to a management agent. |
I am assuming management agent is a different agent that you have only for triggering off processes/agents. Could you pls elaborate? Right now we are using only the mapper & the general purpose agents to take care of tasks. |
A management agent is an agent that you implement, its only difference from your other agents could be that it fires up new agents on your systems. Imagine a setup where each machine runs a management agent and a couple of working agents. You can push a task to the management agent whenever you want to fire up new working agents or to kill some of them. It's nothing Nanite offers at the moment, but I thought about it and it sure would be a nice feature to have. Until then, that'd be my idea of automating the process. |
We have been exactly thinking around these lines! Would be a great nanite feature. I guess you have to get the mapper to listen to hook and fire off a request to this agent (& hope & pray that this agent is running ;)). Right now the array issue is the one thats killing us. Will have to get that fixes before we get to this one. I will keep you posted. |
Two questions
I did read an email from mattmatt a while ago. Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: