You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Part of me is wondering whether to introduce a new bit of syntax, namely |> as syntactic sugar for using apply, such that you could write 1 |> @ + 2 instead of 1 | apply @ + 2.
I'm always hesitant to add new syntax, as i feel like simple syntax but a broad library is what makes MistQL MistQL. This might be an exception though. It's clearly a common use case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Part of me is wondering whether to introduce a new bit of syntax, namely |> as syntactic sugar for using apply, such that you could write
1 |> @ + 2
instead of1 | apply @ + 2
.I'm always hesitant to add new syntax, as i feel like simple syntax but a broad library is what makes MistQL MistQL. This might be an exception though. It's clearly a common use case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: