You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
But it seems this is not possible. I have tried to search for documentation on this subject but i couldn't find anything.
I could create a group for each user restricting to agents/xxxxxxxx but I don't think it would be a good strategy since I will need (at least) a few thousands clients.
Having a group being able to restrict users to their username would be better than creating a lot of groups for me.
Is it possible or should I just allow all my users to read everything and encrypt my messages ? (I am on a semi-public infrastructure).
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm facing the same issue (need to dynamically create temp users and in the same time limit thousands of users to their own dedicated topics only). What I'm affraid is as per this comment from the issue @ckrey linked above, the code for that feature is in develop for 4 years already and there's still no 2.1 release rolled out.
Any security or stability concerns regarding what's currently in develop or what's the reason blocking the 2.1 release?
@Daredevll I want to have all the features in place to remove the need for the per_listener_settings option for 2.1, and just haven't had the time to work on it. The code in develop is fine, we use it as the base of the enterprise version of mosquitto provided by Cedalo.
Hello,
I would like to limit my usergroup "user" to access only their specific topic using
dynamic-security.json
I have tried something like this
But it seems this is not possible. I have tried to search for documentation on this subject but i couldn't find anything.
I could create a group for each user restricting to
agents/xxxxxxxx
but I don't think it would be a good strategy since I will need (at least) a few thousands clients.Having a group being able to restrict users to their username would be better than creating a lot of groups for me.
Is it possible or should I just allow all my users to read everything and encrypt my messages ? (I am on a semi-public infrastructure).
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: