Any option for custom cluster management source/IMembershipTable

[rosslarge]

Hi,

How practical would it be to implement a cluster provider that doesn’t rely on a central db? Each of the nodes in this system is aware of each other through existing configuration. The architecture does not currently require a database and has up to this point relied on WCF P2P to avoid the need for a database. I’m trying to remove the WCF dependency. I’ve considered implementing a provider based on in memory where the membership table is bootstrapped with the known configuration but there are properties such as generation id that aren’t consistent. Maybe this known node (effectively seed nodes) scenario is a square peg for a round hole…

Thanks,
Ross.