You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current DualPipe Bubble Rate is (pp / 2 β 1)(πΉ&π΅ + π΅ β 3π)
Interleave PP Bubble Rate is m / (m + (pp - 1) / v)
It seems that the bubble rate of the current dualpipe implementation will be higher than that of interleave, because of no support for vpp?
The first question is can the dualpipe approach support vpp without affecting other features such as overleaping etc? If possible, will there be a demo implementation in this repository in the future? @beginlner
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Current DualPipe Bubble Rate is (pp / 2 β 1)(πΉ&π΅ + π΅ β 3π)
Interleave PP Bubble Rate is m / (m + (pp - 1) / v)
It seems that the bubble rate of the current dualpipe implementation will be higher than that of interleave, because of no support for vpp?
The first question is can the dualpipe approach support vpp without affecting other features such as overleaping etc? If possible, will there be a demo implementation in this repository in the future?
@beginlner
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: