Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

refactor URI handler to not require the build number #513

Open
matifali opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

refactor URI handler to not require the build number #513

matifali opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@matifali
Copy link
Member

With an end point like https://data.services.jetbrains.com/products?code=GO&type=release&majorVersion=2024.3&latest=true
Is it possible to get the download URL for the latest version?

Can we skip requiring the build number i.e. ide_build_number in the URI to launch JetBrains gateway?
@coder-labeler coder-labeler bot added the question Further information is requested label Dec 12, 2024
@matifali matifali changed the title refactor URI handler to only accept the version refactor URI handler tonot require the build number Dec 12, 2024
@matifali matifali changed the title refactor URI handler tonot require the build number refactor URI handler to not require the build number Dec 12, 2024
@matifali matifali removed the question Further information is requested label Dec 12, 2024
@code-asher
Copy link
Member

Makes sense, so if the build number is omitted we default to the latest.

@matifali
Copy link
Member Author

matifali commented Dec 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Makes sense, so if the build number is omitted we default to the latest.

Yes. We should default to the latest. I want our JetBrains module not to require asking for a build number and a user should just ask for the version they want i.e. version = "2024.3"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@matifali @code-asher