You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have used AutoAugment to train the Cascade R-CNN + ResNeST 50 models on my custom dataset along with the standard detectron2 augmentations of Random Shortest Range (640 - 800) and HFlip. Unfortunately I have not been able to achieve optimal results. I am trying to add mixup to the training process as well, as recommended in the paper. As per my understanding ResNest models were trained with AutoAugment and Mixup while detection and segmentation models were trained with Random Shortest Range and HFlip.
I would like to get some clarity on whether AutoAugment and Mixup were used to train the Cascade R-CNN + ResNeST 50. Kindly let me know if I have misunderstood the augmentation policy for detection and segmentation models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I have used AutoAugment to train the Cascade R-CNN + ResNeST 50 models on my custom dataset along with the standard detectron2 augmentations of Random Shortest Range (640 - 800) and HFlip. Unfortunately I have not been able to achieve optimal results. I am trying to add mixup to the training process as well, as recommended in the paper. As per my understanding ResNest models were trained with AutoAugment and Mixup while detection and segmentation models were trained with Random Shortest Range and HFlip.
I would like to get some clarity on whether AutoAugment and Mixup were used to train the Cascade R-CNN + ResNeST 50. Kindly let me know if I have misunderstood the augmentation policy for detection and segmentation models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: