Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency between addMember() implementation and documentation #51

Open
sourcery-ai bot opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Inconsistency between addMember() implementation and documentation #51

sourcery-ai bot opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

The addMember() method in the codebase has an inconsistency between its implementation and its documentation. The method is currently implemented to always return true, regardless of whether the member already exists. However, the documentation specifies that the method should return false if the member already exists. This discrepancy could potentially lead to bugs, especially in security-related code where the existence of a member needs to be accurately checked.

Suggested Actions:

  1. Review the implementation of addMember() to ensure it aligns with the documented behavior.
  2. Decide whether the documentation should be updated to reflect the current implementation or if the code should be modified to match the documentation.
  3. Consider the implications of this inconsistency on security and other critical areas of the codebase.
  4. Track this issue as a pre-existing condition if it is not addressed immediately, to ensure it is revisited in future updates.

I created this issue for @yingbull from #45 (comment).

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Generate a plan of action: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on this issue.
  • Generate a pull request for this issue: Comment @sourcery-ai develop to
    generate a PR that addresses this issue.

Getting Help

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant