Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ASAM standard.osc support in osc2 scenario_runner #1092

Open
dx6nxr opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

ASAM standard.osc support in osc2 scenario_runner #1092

dx6nxr opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@dx6nxr
Copy link

dx6nxr commented Jun 27, 2024

Hi, following on my previous issue, namely: here, and also issue made by another community member here.
I've been trying to make Scenario runner to work with standard.osc library provided by ASAM, so far I've had tough luck doing it, as it will spit a bunch of syntaxis errors in the standard.osc itself, and will not run a scenario. Current state can be seen on this screenshot:
image
which is pretty odd to me, as officially distributed library must not contain syntax errors. Was scenario_runner even tested with standard.osc? As there are no example or test files using this library, and the instruments that basic.osc provides are pretty "basic", and are not enough for my use case. Is there a way to use standard.osc or will I have to modify basic.osc in a way I need it to be?
Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Ivan Burmistrov

Desktop:

  • OS: win11
  • CARLA: 0.9.15
  • Python version: 3.8.10
  • Version: latest
@DimK19
Copy link

DimK19 commented Aug 30, 2024

I have the same problem. For reference, the file standard.osc is provided by ASAM at this webpage, under “Additional resources”: https://www.asam.net/static_downloads/public/asam-openscenario/2.0.0/domain-model/standard_library.html

@dx6nxr Have you found any solution? Thanks.

@dx6nxr
Copy link
Author

dx6nxr commented Sep 1, 2024

Hey @DimK19,
no, as far as I understood after looking at the files there's no way to make it work without major changes to scenario runner core. Additionally, scenario_runner support for osc2 does not support any triggers (i.e. distance triggers etc), which are very needed for my use-case, so I just settled down on using osc1.0 with all of it's underlying restrictions, but at least it works xD

@DimK19
Copy link

DimK19 commented Sep 2, 2024

there's no way to make it work without major changes to scenario runner core.

I have reached the same conclusion. As yet, osc2 is not sufficiently supported.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants