You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Programming takes so long to learn and write because computers are literal. They require precision; computers (and therefore programs) have no "do what I mean" or "you get the idea" in their nature, whatsoever. (Quora comment)1
A designer can be lazy. A programmer creates a reusable piece of code, so they never have to solve that problem again.2 So how, with the future looming large and the threat of AI taking over, will programmers co-exist with their copilots?
How will kids learn to program in future, or will they even need to?
How can we encourage learning how to think, rather than what to think?3
Which subjects best suit an individual, and how to encourage their path?4
Is AI a good teacher?5 (How will this affect jobs?)
How much programming knowledge to you need to use ChatGPT confidently? Will no-code solutions be the answer in future? How good is the code they generate?
Will programming languages become easier to read and write if the AI is sentient? Or will extensive training be required to use it? Is it sentient enough to not have to be treat like a robot?
This is wishful thinking perhaps. Why does art repeat itself? Why do we create so many versions of furniture, ceramics, or paintings? The same themes in authors work? Why do technology companies create proprietary products, rather than collaborating on standards-based tech? For many problems we don't need to reinvent the wheel, yet we do. ↩
I have some problems with the Chinese way of learning, for example. It's great for Mathematics and some other core subjects, but to me doesn't instil a love of learning for learning's sake. By the time they reach their teens, it feels too much like an exam-factory, spitting out kids who think education is a competition without the flexibility and self-reliance they'll need for Western Universities. ↩
The maths in Structure and Interpretation of Computer Systems is not for me 😉 ↩
A designer can be lazy. A programmer creates a reusable piece of code, so they never have to solve that problem again.2 So how, with the future looming large and the threat of AI taking over, will programmers co-exist with their copilots?
How much programming knowledge to you need to use ChatGPT confidently? Will no-code solutions be the answer in future? How good is the code they generate?
Will programming languages become easier to read and write if the AI is sentient? Or will extensive training be required to use it? Is it sentient enough to not have to be treat like a robot?
Creating flashcards with AI
I'm not sure how good these flashcards' content will be, but you can manually edit them as you go. One potential process could be:
This would work with simple
question/answer
note types, but more involved cards (such asMissing!
) could be harder to achieve.Problems with using AI (ChatGPT)
json
decoderFootnotes
A Quora top comment by David Carew ↩
This is wishful thinking perhaps. Why does art repeat itself? Why do we create so many versions of furniture, ceramics, or paintings? The same themes in authors work? Why do technology companies create proprietary products, rather than collaborating on standards-based tech? For many problems we don't need to reinvent the wheel, yet we do. ↩
I have some problems with the Chinese way of learning, for example. It's great for Mathematics and some other core subjects, but to me doesn't instil a love of learning for learning's sake. By the time they reach their teens, it feels too much like an exam-factory, spitting out kids who think education is a competition without the flexibility and self-reliance they'll need for Western Universities. ↩
The maths in Structure and Interpretation of Computer Systems is not for me 😉 ↩
AI hallucinations and overly confident responses are a big problem. ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: