You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The current project architecture employs custom brokers to manage plugin state changes within the IDE. For example, an Authentication Status Provider and associated Listeners update various Views based on the user's authentication status. While this approach works, it presents several challenges as the system scales:
Proliferation of custom brokers: As events increase, developers must implement multiple brokers, leading to increased complexity and potential code duplication.
Error handling complexity: Ensuring errors in one listener don’t prevent notifications from being sent to other listeners requires careful implementation, increasing the risk of subtle bugs.
Performance bottlenecks: Listeners often execute on the same thread as the event publisher, which can impact plugin responsiveness, especially with time-consuming operations or numerous listeners.
Concurrency and Ordering Challenges: While single-threaded custom brokers maintain natural event order, they limit concurrency. Introducing multi-threading to improve performance can lead to race conditions, deadlocks, and difficulties in maintaining consistent event ordering, potentially resulting in inconsistent plugin states.
Lack of event persistence: Custom brokers typically don’t provide built-in support for event persistence. This can make it difficult to implement features like event replay, auditing, or recovering from system failures.
Describe the solution you'd like
An event bus architecture presents an effective solution to the current challenges in our IDE plugin system. By providing a centralized mechanism for event management, an event bus can simplify our codebase, improve scalability, and enhance performance through better concurrency handling. It offers built-in error management, supports event persistence, and promotes a more decoupled architecture. This approach not only addresses our immediate issues with custom brokers but also sets a foundation for future enhancements, making our system more robust, maintainable, and extensible. Implementing an event bus can significantly streamline our development process and improve the overall reliability of our plugin architecture.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The current project architecture employs custom brokers to manage plugin state changes within the IDE. For example, an Authentication Status Provider and associated Listeners update various Views based on the user's authentication status. While this approach works, it presents several challenges as the system scales:
Describe the solution you'd like
An event bus architecture presents an effective solution to the current challenges in our IDE plugin system. By providing a centralized mechanism for event management, an event bus can simplify our codebase, improve scalability, and enhance performance through better concurrency handling. It offers built-in error management, supports event persistence, and promotes a more decoupled architecture. This approach not only addresses our immediate issues with custom brokers but also sets a foundation for future enhancements, making our system more robust, maintainable, and extensible. Implementing an event bus can significantly streamline our development process and improve the overall reliability of our plugin architecture.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: