We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cf. RascalSoftware/RAT-Docs#1 ; if API reference is autogenerated, then some kind of docstring formatting convention should be used to improve the way it is formatted in the documentation. This can be in the RST docstring style, or the Numpy or Google style (and we can then use the Sphinx extension napoleon to convert)
napoleon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have agreed to use the numpy style to be consistent with Python API and RasCAL
Sorry, something went wrong.
The user facing functions should be priority for docstring refactoring. This should help keep track of what's left and who is doing what
No branches or pull requests
cf. RascalSoftware/RAT-Docs#1 ; if API reference is autogenerated, then some kind of docstring formatting convention should be used to improve the way it is formatted in the documentation. This can be in the RST docstring style, or the Numpy or Google style (and we can then use the Sphinx extension
napoleon
to convert)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: