Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Content: writing good documentations #43

Closed
Remi-Gau opened this issue Oct 6, 2018 · 8 comments
Closed

Content: writing good documentations #43

Remi-Gau opened this issue Oct 6, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@Remi-Gau
Copy link

Remi-Gau commented Oct 6, 2018

In line with issue #29, this came across my twitter line and made me realize that, unless I have overlooked it, I have not seen anything yet in the MOOC about writing documentation (what it entails and what guidelines to follow, what tools might exist).

Is that something worth considering or adding?

Was not sure whether it was more adated to this module or to module 3

@Protohedgehog
Copy link
Contributor

That's a good idea! Do you mean things like good README files? We have a bit of that in the first Task, but it could perhaps be expanded on there?

@schlauch
Copy link

I think that this is a good point. In addition, the README is the first impression that you make and it is a kind of light-weight documentation artifact. I found some examples of how to structure READMEs here: https://github.com/matiassingers/awesome-readme#tools

@Protohedgehog
Copy link
Contributor

I've already included some information here on how to write a good README file. But please do expand on it if you think it can be improved! @Remi-Gau @schlauch :)

@Protohedgehog
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @Remi-Gau and @schlauch - do you think this is okay for now, so I can close this issue, or still room for improvement? :)

@schlauch
Copy link

Yes, I think that task 1 already does a good Job explaining the basic aspects :)

@Protohedgehog
Copy link
Contributor

OK, will wait for @Remi-Gau to have a look before closing this - thank you!!

@Remi-Gau
Copy link
Author

I think it is better to close the issue for now. I had some other ideas but most of them are too raw, halfbaked and generally disorganized that I can write them down.
I might reopen it later and or directly send a PR once I got it sorted.

@Protohedgehog
Copy link
Contributor

OK, sweet, thanks @Remi-Gau! Would be sweet to get back on this as your thoughts develop, but I think we at least have the basics covered for now :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants