Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verify image display scaling (min/max) for all UCoMP products over solar cycle #295

Open
29 tasks
bberkeyU opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
29 tasks
Assignees
Labels
bug fix of a problem in the existing code
Milestone

Comments

@bberkeyU
Copy link
Contributor

bberkeyU commented Sep 4, 2024

Verify the image scaling for the UCoMP engineering plots: /hao/acos/ucomp/engineering/YYYY/MM/DD

  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.28day.synoptic.doppler.r108.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.28day.synoptic.doppler.r130.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.28day.synoptic.int.r108.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.28day.synoptic.int.r130.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.28day.synoptic.linpol.r108.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.28day.synoptic.linpol.r130.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.28day.synoptic.radazi.r108.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.synoptic.radazi.r130.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.daily.centering.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.daily.eccentricity.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.daily.flats.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.daily.radius-diff.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.daily.temp_vs_volt.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.daily.vcrosstalk.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.mission.backgrounds.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.mission.centering.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.mission.eccentricity.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.mission.image_scale.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.mission.radius-diff.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.WAVE.mission.vcrosstalk.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.daily.darks.gif
  • YYYYMMDDucomp.daily.raw.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.daily.sgs.dec.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.daily.sgs.ra.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.daily.sgs.signal.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.daily.sgs.sky_transmission_and_seeing.gif
  • YYYYMMDD.ucomp.memory.gif

Tasks

  • don't use gamma for synoptic maps
  • determine why the 28 day synoptic map FITS images are saturated in some coronal locations when the level 1 FITS images are not saturated
@bberkeyU bberkeyU added this to the UCoMP 1.1 milestone Sep 4, 2024
@mgalloy mgalloy added the bug fix of a problem in the existing code label Sep 4, 2024
@mgalloy mgalloy changed the title Verify image scaling for all UCoMP products. Verify image scaling for all UCoMP products Sep 4, 2024
@bberkeyU bberkeyU changed the title Verify image scaling for all UCoMP products Verify image display scaling (min/max/) for all UCoMP products Sep 25, 2024
@detoma detoma changed the title Verify image display scaling (min/max/) for all UCoMP products Verify image display scaling for all UCoMP products over solar cycle Sep 25, 2024
@bberkeyU bberkeyU changed the title Verify image display scaling (min/max/) for all UCoMP products Verify image display scaling (min/max) for all UCoMP products Sep 25, 2024
@detoma detoma changed the title Verify image display scaling (min/max) for all UCoMP products Verify image display scaling (min/max) for all UCoMP products over solar cycle Sep 25, 2024
@jburkepile
Copy link

jburkepile commented Oct 20, 2024

I have been looking at the 28 day intensity synoptic maps. My first two observations are 1) do not use a gamma function when creating the gif synoptic maps. the gamma function is used to offset the radial brightness gradient with height, but the maps are all at one height. Gamma function is not needed or wanted. 2) The 28 day synoptic fits images are saturated in places but the level 1 fits images are not saturated. Action items:

  • Turn off the gamma function for the synoptic map gif images
  • Determine why the 28 day synoptic map fits images are saturated in some coronal locations when the level 1 fits images are not saturated.

Here is an example of a 1074 synoptic map at 1.08 solar radii that is saturated in the gif and fits but the Level 1 fits images are not saturated:

20220930 ucomp 1074 28day synoptic int r108

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug fix of a problem in the existing code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants