Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distributed slack bus #23

Closed
richardkue opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Distributed slack bus #23

richardkue opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@richardkue
Copy link

Are there any needs or current developments regarding a distributed slack bus in the power flow calculation?

@rdzman
Copy link
Member

rdzman commented Jan 6, 2022

Sorry for the delayed response ...

Since MOST is based on the optimal power flow problem, rather than a simple power flow, it does not use the concept of a slack bus at all.

Assuming you are actually referring to distributed slack capabilities in MATPOWER (issue tracker here) as opposed to MOST, that is in runpf(), the answer is that we do not currently have any specific plans under way to add this capability, but would be happy to consider any code contributions toward it.

@richardkue
Copy link
Author

richardkue commented Jan 6, 2022

I meant a distributed slack in runpf and I am thinking about making a contribution.
Is an implementation in one algorithm (e.g. Newton, power, polar) enough to get into a release?

EDIT: Sorry, I just realised I posted my issue in the wrong repository. The issue should be in matpower.

@richardkue
Copy link
Author

At my own fork of the matpower repository I created a pull request with a concept/idea on how to implement a power flow with distributed slack bus.
I would appreciate it if you have a quick look and can give me some feedback!

@rdzman
Copy link
Member

rdzman commented Jan 7, 2022

If you don't mind, could you please create a new issue in the matpower repository and I'll follow up there. Thanks.

@richardkue
Copy link
Author

I created a new issue in matpower. This one can be closed. Sorry for the inconvenience!

@rdzman
Copy link
Member

rdzman commented Jan 14, 2022

Further discussion moved to MATPOWER/matpower#136.

@rdzman rdzman closed this as completed Jan 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants