-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2024.05.29 #57
Comments
Attended |
attended |
Attended |
attended |
1 similar comment
attended |
Attended |
Hi all, made these quickly as replacements for A. B, and C. They would go Gold, Silver, and Certified based on percentile scores. Let me know if use of the logo for a draft is not advisable and we can change it. |
MoM Chris opens the meeting at 1700 BST Sustainable AI development and deployment. Standardizing AI sustainability framework. Using impact framework to calculate SCI scores and avoid greenwashing. Using blockchain for sustainability impact measurement and reporting. AI benchmarking for energy efficiency in the airline industry. AI certification program for LLMs, feedback sought. Creating a benchmark for a new operating system. Action Items
|
@sk16-dev this is generally ok for draft projects. But we do need to start being more consistent and public regarding the state of this project, it's currently in draft which is an indication that it's something just in active discussion and it's not a spec we have consensus over. This is the explanation of the lifecycle of spec projects here: https://wiki.greensoftware.foundation/governance/projects/project-processes/project-lifecycle/document-project-lifecycle @chrisxie-fw and @seanmcilroy29 I've created a pull request which is the standard disclaimer we add to all non-ratified projects here: #58 If you look at say the Impact Framework (which is in "incubation" state which is the software equivalent state of "draft" for spec projects) we are very clear in all the documentation and websites with a banner at the top like so https://if.greensoftware.org |
2024.05.29 Agenda/Minutes
Time: Bi-weekly @ 1700 (BST) - See the time in your timezone
Antitrust Policy
Joint Development Foundation meetings may involve participation by industry competitors, and the Joint Development Foundation intends to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is, therefore, extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas and be aware of and not participate in any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.
If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel or counsel to the Joint Development Foundation, DLA Piper.
Recordings
WG agreed to record all Meetings. This meeting recording will be available until the next scheduled meeting.
Meeting recording link
Roll Call
Please add 'Attended' to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance.
Any untracked attendees will be added by the GSF team below:
Agenda
Introductions
Discussion
Project Dashboard
AOB
Future meeting Agenda submissions
Previous meeting AI's
Action Items
Next Meeting
Adjourn
Meeting Action Items / Standing Agenda / Future Agenda submissions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: