You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The idea is to let set_display() have two more parameters dpi and width which can change the image dpi and width for all images displayed by the Figure.show() calls.
Personally I don't see a use-case for setting a global dpi or width (but happy to be proven wrong). My suggestion is that we only let this set_display function set the method and not do anything about the dpi or width. Haven't looked too closely, but I think most of the changes were made in ca0ecb3 and could be partially reverted there. Not doing anything about the dpi/width would also greatly reduce the diff on this PR and make it easier to review. Discuss first though.
Are you willing to help implement and maintain this feature?
Maybe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description of the desired feature
The idea is to let
set_display()
have two more parametersdpi
andwidth
which can change the image dpi and width for all images displayed by theFigure.show()
calls.Some comments originally posted by @weiji14 in #529 (comment)
Are you willing to help implement and maintain this feature?
Maybe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: