Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Icon request: Leetcode #18643

Closed
5 tasks
jorjishasan opened this issue Feb 4, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
5 tasks

Icon request: Leetcode #18643

jorjishasan opened this issue Feb 4, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@jorjishasan
Copy link

What can it be used for?
This is the high time of having competitive programming skills. Leetcode is top of the mark in competitive programming and interview prep Platforms. You people doing great for making ease of using your's asset. So, why not leetcode? I can't wait to see the leetcode icon in font-awesome.

Example image (optional)
image

Icon request checklist

  • This is a single icon or matched pair (Ex: lock / unlock)
  • The title starts with "Icon request: " and is followed by the requested icon name (Ex: Icon request: magical-unicorn)
  • I have searched for existing issues and to the best of my knowledge this is not a duplicate
  • I have included at least one example image if it could be helpful (optional)
  • The request is for a concrete object (it's harder to make an icon to represent happiness, it's easier to make a smiley face. ☺)
@tagliala
Copy link
Member

tagliala commented Feb 4, 2022

Hi!

Thanks for being part of the Font Awesome Community.

This request is a duplicate of #15337, please add a 👍 reaction to that request.

Please make sure you search existing requests before opening new ones

You may also be interested in taking a look at our Icon Leaderboard FAQs, they contain a lot of information about how requests work

Closing here

@tagliala tagliala closed this as completed Feb 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants